separable prefix造句

Many German verbs have a separable prefix, often with an adverbial function.
If the verb contains a separable prefix, it usually stands between the auxiliary and the noun.
I'm used to things like um, aus, an, etc being separable prefixes.
:: I am almost certain that these constructions are calques from German expressions using " mit " as a separable prefix.
Furthermore, there are instances where German uses a preposition in a way that might seem strange to a native English speaker, e . g . as a separable prefix attributed to a verb.
It's difficult to find separable prefix in a sentence. 用separable prefix造句挺难的

You must put it to beginning of the sentence, separate the separable prefix before that, and place the personal pronouns " wir " or " Sie " directly after it.
Didn't this problem arise when English grammar was made to comply with Latin grammar instead of Germanic grammars, such as separable prefixes ? LShecut2nd 13 : 59, 11 September 2007 ( UTC)
Many English phrasal verbs contain German are separable prefixes, which also often have the same form as prepositions : for example, Dutch " aanbieden " and German " anbieten " ( both meaning " to offer " ) contain the separable prefix " aan / an ", which is also a preposition meaning " on " or " to ".
Many English phrasal verbs contain German are separable prefixes, which also often have the same form as prepositions : for example, Dutch " aanbieden " and German " anbieten " ( both meaning " to offer " ) contain the separable prefix " aan / an ", which is also a preposition meaning " on " or " to ".
Another way to analyze examples like the first one above would be to allow arbitrary " postposition + verb " sequences to act as transitive separable prefix verbs ( e . g . " in + lopen " ?! " inlopen " ); but such an analysis would not be consistent with the position of " in " in the second example . ( The postposition " can " also appear in the verbal prefix position : " [ . . . ] dat hij zo'n donker bos niet durft in te lopen [ . . . ] " .)